That video of the 2 teens who claimed "we got em Apoc"
|
That video of the 2 teens who claimed "we got em Apoc"
|
01-19-2025, 01:12 AM
They are now in their 20s.... That was a classic video from 2018.
Darn shame youtube deleted it for a Terms of Service violation, almost the same day you got released in April 2018 Kind of funny with great timing getting it deleted before you could see it.
01-19-2025, 01:17 AM
I saw it, it was on there for a few months after I had gotten out.
01-19-2025, 02:00 AM
You need to stop the lying.
You didn't... It was pulled April 11, 2018 while you were in jail... And I got tons of screenshots of you complaining about it how google was "conspiring against you" and working with the cops and feds. All you got is a snapshot of it from hateandflame. I might have the video by the way, after you get out of prison for all this child porn possession stuff... I might show it. Don't want to interfere with your current case or all your so-called civil cases which you will never file. Too bad you didn't take my advice and hire a real lawyer, who would have secured that video as evidence... Oh well, YOU KNOW IT ALL
01-19-2025, 02:23 AM
(01-19-2025, 02:00 AM)NO TOAD Wrote: You need to stop the lying. Nope, it was not, I actually saw it. those screenshot that you have, have nothing to do with the case or the motion to dismiss. The screenshot from hate and flame was the threat, which my IP was not attached too, and Near Free Speech the ISP who hosted Hate and Flame own lawyer even stated and it in the record that my IP had not been on that site at all. The video doesn't mean shit. the issue is the police not doing their job and investigating it properly. As well not following proper procedures when investigating.
You can stop the lying Todd. You never saw the video, as it was pulled before you got out of jail. And like I said, I got dozens of screenshots complaining from you how Google was hiding evidence... Did you forget????
Now Jeremy Daugherty, who was a frequent visitor to hateandflame as your own documents indicate, he may have seen it the video, but you didn't. And answer the question, how could you have been so stupid to post your own social security number????? And yea, and there is this, which is information you posted yourself that is not in any court records..... That will label you for the rest of your life, and you freely published on your own. The internet doesn't care about court procedure... Maybe facebook should see this... ![[Image: fgNGlm0.jpeg]](https://i.imgur.com/fgNGlm0.jpeg)
01-19-2025, 05:56 AM
BUT SHIT STAIN THERE ARE DOCUMENTS THAT I DIDN'T POST. YOU'RE BASING YOU CLAIM ON A FEW DOCUMENTS AND NOT ALL OF THEM. SECONDLY THERE WERE DOCUMENTS THAT WE FINALLY RECEIVED THAT THE STATE WAS WITHHOLDING AND SHOULD OF BE IN DISCOVERY
BUT WEREN'T THAT HAD MORE EVIDENCE THAT WASN'T ORIGINALLY KNOWN
Again, you are wrong, I did see, the video was up when I got out back in 2018. In fact, someone sent me an email with a link to it. It was shortly after that, it has disappeared I want to download it as evidence, and I even emailed YouTube why they had taken it down.
NO TOAD. You never saw the video.. And your changing your story in your schizophrenic mind of yours again.. Just like how you changed your story and lied to the cops during your interview in March 2018.. How could you have been so stupid to not ask for a lawyer before questioning?
Quote:Again, you are wrong, I did see, the video was up when I got out back in 2018. In fact, someone sent me an email with a link to it. It was shortly after that, it has disappeared Quote:It was shortly after that, it has disappeared Nope. It was pulled April 10, 2018.... The question you need to ask is why I know that date so well???? EDIT: I meant to include this quote [quote=admin]I saw it, it was on there for a few months after I had gotten out. [/admin] Another edit. The FBI says it's real child porn you had along with 1,000s of virtual child porn and 1,000s of cartoon child porn and FBI Agent O'Sullivan is going to testify to that. Again, how can virtual porn have a date of birth, a statement from the mother, and a conviction from the person who actually took the photos??? Your motion to dismiss is going to get denied, Tiffany already has told you the DA is working on that happening, the case will go to trial and you will be found guilty and sentenced to the absolute maximum sentence possible. Tiffany will be urging you to accept a plea deal for you to avoid a decade in prison.
01-19-2025, 11:39 PM
Quote:The FBI says it's real child porn you had along with 1,000s of virtual child porn and 1,000s of cartoon child porn and FBI Agent O'Sullivan is going to testify to that. Again, how can virtual porn have a date of birth, a statement from the mother, and a conviction from the person who actually took the photos??? I don't know where the real shit came from, as for the virtual and cartoon stuff that shit is legal. O'Sullivan stated in his report that he found a computer-generated image, which at that time he stopped so they could another warrant, which they got two years later. The second warrant is invalid because they waited too long to get the second warrant, so anything they found with that warrant they can't use. That why they are only going after me for one image (the computer-generated image) because that was what they found under the first warrant. the image in that state report (which you keep post) was found under the second warrant which can't be used because that warrant is invalid because like I said they took too long to get it. (if you actually read and understand the Motion to dismiss, you would see that is one of the arguments we are make). If the motion to dismiss get denied they will automatically appeal it right, then and there. Tiffany didn't tell me shit, they state need another delay because they're trying to find a loophole to get out of this mess. I already I'm not taking plea deals because they (the state and police) FUCKED UP and they know, and I AM GOING TO SUE THE FUCKERS, BELIEVE ME (01-19-2025, 11:39 PM)admin Wrote: O'Sullivan stated in his report that he found a computer-generated image, No he didn't mother fucker.... He said the image was real, he's been a forensic examiner for ten years and the image was someone from the age from 3 to 5 with a penis in their mouth... Not only did he say that, but the Department of Homeland Security found the name of the victim, the mother's name, and the perps name who got convicted on that image. Remember, you uploaded the documents yourself...... And I got them saved. So you can stop the lying... Your lawyer isn't buying it nor did she mention it in the Motion to Dismiss So when this goes to trial, and it will go to trial because she knows the judge is going to reject it, you're going to prison.... And I'll be laughing... Quote:If the motion to dismiss get denied they will automatically appeal it right, then and there You can't and you are not legally allowed to say a word because you not an officer of the court, she is... Unless of course you fire her, which the judge will probably require you to have an psychiatric exam to make sure you are competent enough to representative yourself. Since your parents are your legal guardians, they can decide that for you also. And finally, there is no way you would pass the psychiatric exam as you are documented retarded with reading, writing, speaking, and learning disabilities, all the way back to grade school... Unless of course your parents want to put up another 5 figures to hire you private council, who will immediately make you stop posting online as they CAN dismiss you as a client for not following instructions. Basically, you're fucked... And who knows, maybe you're be arrested for AI child porn before all that happens..... Basically, you're fucked. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
