Posts: 39
Threads: 8
Joined: Jan 2025
Supreme Court rulings are not absolute...
They are very narrow and yes, can be overturned...
might I suggest Roe vs Wade as an example that rulings are not absolute.
But as mentioned, you wouldn't have the money to fight it and I don't think parents are going to spend any more on you and your shit...
I hope you are made an example out of it.
Posts: 415
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
Their ruling can be overturned by them. Your debating apples and oranges. Abortion had to deal with murdering unborn children, while mine is about a general warrant, something that been illegal since the founding the US.
I can get a lawyer who will work on contingency, where I don't have to pay him if I don't win. If I win, he gets a small percent of the winning. Which I believe is around 33 to 40% percent. I believe Illinois actually has a law that sets then percentage which I believe is 25% of If anything I can Pro se it.
Posts: 39
Threads: 8
Joined: Jan 2025
01-20-2025, 06:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2025, 06:30 PM by NO TOAD.)
No lawyer will take your case on contingency... And none for a criminal case.
They only take cases where they know they will win a large sum of money.
Constitutional issues are not among them.
Or else you would have gotten one many years ago...
And no, you've already been told by Tiffany, it's not a general warrant as the state already has the argument set up since the warrant did mention what they were looking for. It will be going to trial. You know this.
Oh, and the first thing a contingency lawyer will do it make you take down all your shit... Or they won't represent you. It isn't like a public defender where they are stuck with you.
Posts: 415
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
THEN I'LL PRO SE IT BITCH... YOU AND THOSE FUCKING COCKSUCKERS AT THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND TAYLORVILLE POLICE CAN GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU HEAR ME BITCH!!!
Posts: 415
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
01-20-2025, 08:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2025, 08:41 PM by admin.)
The warrant didn't state what the crime was, nor did it state what they police was allowed to search for in association with the crime. THEREFOR IT IS A GENERAL SEARCH WARRANT (which is UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the fourth amendment)
Posts: 39
Threads: 8
Joined: Jan 2025
NO TOAD. Tiffany is going to accept the state's answer it wasn't a general warrant and your case will go to trail, she already told you this as you stated previously. Just like how did didn't object to the state asking for 30 more days.
AND YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THE MATTER, SHE DECIDES EVERYTHING!!!
Now go to your room.
Posts: 415
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
No you are wrong....
The state is entitled to respond to the motion to dismiss.
Posts: 39
Threads: 8
Joined: Jan 2025
NO TOAD. Go back and read what you said was going to happen, 4 things.... and none of them happened, did it? Tiffany is the one in charge, not you.
Mommy says go to your room
Posts: 415
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
because the state needs more time to write a response because they are trying to weasel their way out of it.