Todd Daugherty's N9OGL Official Board
How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - Printable Version

+- Todd Daugherty's N9OGL Official Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl)
+-- Forum: General (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Main Board (http://160.32.227.211/n9ogl/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? (/showthread.php?tid=62)

Pages: 1 2 3

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-13-2025

nope, again the ISP believed cartoon images was realistic child porn, in fact other letters to Ms. Diemer from not only me but to them at the time even state that it was cartoon images which again doesn't fall under the category of child porn. As for writing, I have right to read and write obscene material in the privacy of my home (Stanley v Georgia 1969 US Supreme Court)

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - Guest - 01-13-2025

So your defense to having child porn images is you have the right to view them in your home, although it's not your home and your parents can at any time take away your access to the internet.

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-13-2025

(01-13-2025, 10:16 PM)Guest Wrote: So your defense to having child porn images is you have the right to view them in your home, although it's not your home and your parents can at any time take away your access to the internet.

I don't nor have I ever had child porn. Child porn is images of real children engaged in a sexual act. Computer generated and anime images is not child porn because it is not a real child.

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - Guest - 01-13-2025

(01-13-2025, 10:26 PM)admin Wrote:
(01-13-2025, 10:16 PM)Guest Wrote: So your defense to having child porn images is you have the right to view them in your home, although it's not your home and your parents can at any time take away your access to the internet.

I don't nor have I ever had child porn. Child porn is images of real children engaged in a sexual act. Computer generated and anime images is not child porn because it is not a real child.

 Yes, you did.

[Image: 4F7IHkX.jpeg]

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-14-2025

It is state that saying it's real but the FBI Agent who found it says it's computer generated

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - Guest - 01-14-2025

No Toad. They got a date of birth of the child you victimized by downloading her child porn. The FBI also found 1,000s of virtual child porn images on top of the real child porn. You are being charged with the real thing. It shows a pattern that you are sexually aroused by children which will be considered when you are found guilty and sentenced.

[Image: 4F7IHkX.jpeg]
[Image: 4F7IHkX.jpeg]

[Image: ip2map.gif]

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-14-2025

I suggest you read the title again ILLINOIS STATE POLICE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT NOT THE FBI

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-14-2025

The police claim it is a real image but the FBI says it was computer generated.


We were under the impression it was a real image, because the police and state were WITHHOLDING information that stated it was computer generated, they had withheld 700 MB of documents in this case that I have yet to see. It was material that was withheld from discovery, they were trying to hide it.

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - admin - 01-14-2025

I would also like to point out that they found that computer generated image, when they weren't supposed to be looking for images to begin with. They ONLY found that computer generated images because as stated before the search warrant was a General Warrant.

RE: How stupid is the Taylorville Police and State Attorney?? - NO TOAD - 01-14-2025

(01-14-2025, 02:06 AM)admin Wrote: The police claim it is a real image but the FBI says it was computer generated.

NO TOAD. A computer generated image can't have a date of birth and a mother's statement and a real name, which I'm sure you are still taunting the poor girl to this day like you did on KiwiFarms by bragging "she's legal now"

And it was the FBI and Homeland Security who confirmed it's a real image.