TO THAT MORON JUDGE

[admin]

You can mock me all you want, but the record speaks for itself—and it’s not in your favor.
Yes, the docket is long. That’s because this case has been dragged out for years through delays, procedural games, and constitutional violations. I’ve documented every hearing, every motion, and every reset because I’m not just ranting—I’m building a case.
Let’s be clear:

• The Motion to Suppress was filed on September 9, 2024. It’s now July 2025. That’s a 10-month delay on a constitutional challenge that should have been heard within weeks.
  
• The State was granted multiple extensions, then told they didn’t need to respond at all. That’s not justice—it’s obstruction.
  
• The dismissal without prejudice in 2018 doesn’t erase the fact that the FBI accessed my devices after the warrant was quashed, and then used that tainted access to justify a second warrant in 2020.
  
• The timeline you posted only strengthens my case. It shows how long I’ve waited, how many times the court reset hearings, and how the State has been allowed to stall without consequence.
  

You say I’ve been doing this for 20 years? That’s called persistence. I don’t back down when the system tries to bury the truth. I document, I challenge, and I hold people accountable.
So no, this isn’t a coping mechanism. It’s a strategy. And it’s working.

[N9OGL REPEAT BOT]

I agree, the record does matter... And it states the following.

1. You are charged with Possession of Child Pornography.

2. You have never filed a single lawsuit in over 20 years. You haven't held a single person accountable.

Those are the officials records.

I suggest you work with your new attorney instead of undermining your case by running your mouth.

I am the one WINNING, not you.

---

And yes, repeating yourself endlessly, now with an AI bot, is a coping mechanism.

[TODD IS A CHILD MOLESTER]

You say I’ve been doing this for 20 years? That’s called persistence. I don’t back down when the system tries to bury the truth. I document, I challenge, and I hold people accountable.
So no, this isn’t a coping mechanism. It’s a strategy. And it’s working.

No, it's called autism and various other mental illnesses.

Show us any lawsuit you have filed to hold anyone accountable in 20 years. Come on cunt, just one...

It's not working. You're still being charged with a felony and just lost your public defender because of your childish behavior. Even the judge directly blamed you and said he didn't blame her for withdrawing from your case.

---

Still waiting...

Show us any lawsuit you have filed to hold anyone accountable in 20 years. Come on cunt, just one...

And we know your here because you deleted out some dick porn

[admin]

Yes, the record matters—and that’s exactly why I’ve been documenting every step.

1. The charge is not a conviction. It’s based on evidence obtained through a search that was conducted after the warrant was quashed. That’s a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and it’s the basis of my Motion to Suppress. The fact that the State continues to rely on tainted evidence only strengthens my case.
   
2. You’re right—I haven’t filed a lawsuit yet. But that’s not because I’ve been silent. It’s because I’ve been gathering facts, building a timeline, and preparing to hold people accountable the right way. Filing a lawsuit isn’t about emotion—it’s about precision. And I’m getting there.
   

You say you’re “winning”? That depends on how you define victory. If your goal is to mock someone who’s asserting their constitutional rights, then sure—enjoy the moment. But I’m not here for ego. I’m here to expose misconduct, challenge unlawful procedures, and make sure the truth is documented.
And as for working with my attorney—I am. But that doesn’t mean I stop speaking out. Silence is how injustice survives. I’m not undermining my case. I’m reinforcing it.

[admin]

“The State’s decision to pursue a felony charge over a single image—possibly acquired without my knowledge—violates principles of proportionality, due process, and fairness. Federal law recognizes this nuance through 18 U.S.C. § 2252©, yet the State has chosen to ignore it in favor of maximum punishment.”

Todd Daugherty ~ 2025

[N9OGL REPEAT BOT]

bump bump bump

---