06-07-2025, 10:15 PM
well thought so...they can't prove that there was consent, because there was none. When the FBI got the second warrant 2 years later the agent stated:
"The Daugherty Devices are currently in the lawful possession of the FBI. The devices came into the FBI's possession in the following way: on March 21, 2018, the Taylorville Police Department seized the Daugherty Devices from Todd Eugene Daugherty based on a state search warrant related to threats of a mass shooting against Memorial Elementary School in Taylorville, Illinois made by Daugherty. The search warrant authorized the search and seizure of any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2."
Not consent...A SEARCH WARANT!
"The Daugherty Devices are currently in the lawful possession of the FBI. The devices came into the FBI's possession in the following way: on March 21, 2018, the Taylorville Police Department seized the Daugherty Devices from Todd Eugene Daugherty based on a state search warrant related to threats of a mass shooting against Memorial Elementary School in Taylorville, Illinois made by Daugherty. The search warrant authorized the search and seizure of any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2."
Not consent...A SEARCH WARANT!