07-12-2025, 08:21 PM
Let’s correct your misstatements with facts—not assumptions.
- The case was dismissed, not nolle prosequi. The State’s Attorney filed a formal motion to dismiss, which the judge granted. That’s not a pause—it’s a termination. Your claim that it was “nolle prosequi” is factually wrong, and I have the court documents to prove it.
- The arrest warrant was quashed, and the dismissal was based on lack of evidence. The search yielded nothing, and the website in question allowed anonymous posts—undermining the entire premise of the charges.
- The judge’s comment about continued investigation doesn’t override the dismissal. It acknowledged the state’s intent, not its legal authority. Eight years later, no new charges have been filed—because there’s no case.
- Statute of limitations arguments fail when the harm is ongoing. If the state and federal agencies continue to act as if the case is active, then the clock hasn’t stopped ticking—it’s still running.
- Damages aren’t limited to employment or benefits. Emotional distress, reputational harm, and constitutional violations are compensable. And no, preexisting conditions don’t cancel out new trauma. That’s not how civil rights law works.
- I’m not acting out—I’m acting legally. I’m documenting misconduct, building a case, and preparing to hold every responsible party accountable. If that makes you uncomfortable, it’s because the truth is finally catching up.