07-12-2025, 09:45 PM
This really pisses me off:
01/07/2025
ASA LD; DEFENDANT WITH PD SENGER; B/A, STATE GIVEN AN ADDITIONAL 30-DAYS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS; FURTHER STATUS HEARING ON FEBRUARY 11, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.
BMK
01/07/2025
Status hearing set for 02/11/2025 at 8:30 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
11/19/2024
SA. D PRESENT WITH PD. RESET FOR ADDITIONAL STATUS JAN 7, 2025 @
845.
CBH
11/19/2024
Status hearing set for 01/07/2025 at 8:45 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
10/01/2024
SA PRESENT. D PRESENT WITH PD. STATE NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO MOT TO SUPRESS. RESPONSE DUE BY NOV 19. 2024 @ 845.
CBH
10/01/2024
Status hearing set for 11/19/2024 at 8:45 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
09/10/2024
ASA PRESENT. D PRESENT W. ATTY SENGER. STATUS ON MOTION TO SUPRESS OCT 1, 2024 @ 8:45
The motion to suppress was filed on September 10, 2024, and you gave the state how many months to response to the motion??
well, On October 1 the state claimed they need more time, and you gave them till November 19th. They then proceed that they needed more time going to January 7th, 2025, which again the state asked for more time to February 11th, 2025. Then the state did this:
04/08/2025 SA MCWARD; DEFENDANT WITH PD SENGER; OVER OBJECTION OF STATE, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED; HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS RESET TO JUNE 19, 2025 AT 1:00 P.M.
they objected to the motion to suppress. then you claim in court that they aren't required to response to the motion.
SO BASICALLY, this is telling me that you're a fucking moron who wasted my time when this shit could have been resolved last year or at the beginning of the year. But hey that's OK I will be using this in my lawsuit against the state. 50 MILLION DOLLARS MOTHERFUCKER!!
01/07/2025
ASA LD; DEFENDANT WITH PD SENGER; B/A, STATE GIVEN AN ADDITIONAL 30-DAYS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS; FURTHER STATUS HEARING ON FEBRUARY 11, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.
BMK
01/07/2025
Status hearing set for 02/11/2025 at 8:30 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
11/19/2024
SA. D PRESENT WITH PD. RESET FOR ADDITIONAL STATUS JAN 7, 2025 @
845.
CBH
11/19/2024
Status hearing set for 01/07/2025 at 8:45 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
10/01/2024
SA PRESENT. D PRESENT WITH PD. STATE NEEDS ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO MOT TO SUPRESS. RESPONSE DUE BY NOV 19. 2024 @ 845.
CBH
10/01/2024
Status hearing set for 11/19/2024 at 8:45 in courtroom B.
UNASSIGNED
09/10/2024
ASA PRESENT. D PRESENT W. ATTY SENGER. STATUS ON MOTION TO SUPRESS OCT 1, 2024 @ 8:45
The motion to suppress was filed on September 10, 2024, and you gave the state how many months to response to the motion??
well, On October 1 the state claimed they need more time, and you gave them till November 19th. They then proceed that they needed more time going to January 7th, 2025, which again the state asked for more time to February 11th, 2025. Then the state did this:
04/08/2025 SA MCWARD; DEFENDANT WITH PD SENGER; OVER OBJECTION OF STATE, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED; HEARING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS RESET TO JUNE 19, 2025 AT 1:00 P.M.
they objected to the motion to suppress. then you claim in court that they aren't required to response to the motion.
SO BASICALLY, this is telling me that you're a fucking moron who wasted my time when this shit could have been resolved last year or at the beginning of the year. But hey that's OK I will be using this in my lawsuit against the state. 50 MILLION DOLLARS MOTHERFUCKER!!