EIGHT YEARS

[admin]

Yes, the charges were dismissed without prejudice—which means the State retains the right to refile. That’s not in dispute. What is in dispute is the legitimacy of the investigation, the validity of the evidence, and the constitutional violations that have occurred since day one.
Let’s break it down:

• The dismissal with leave to reinstate was granted while I was in custody, based on an investigation that had already been compromised by false warrant affidavits, unlawful searches, and misuse of seized property.
  
• The transcript confirms that the judge acknowledged the State’s right to refile—but it does not validate the underlying misconduct.
  
• The fact that the investigation continues after the warrant was quashed, and after the FBI accessed the devices without legal authority, only strengthens my case for suppression and civil rights violations.
  
• Posting documents selectively doesn’t change the fact that the timeline exposes a pattern of abuse—from the baseless arrest in 2018 to the procedural delays in 2025.
  

Dismissal without prejudice is not a blank check. It’s a procedural tool—not a shield against accountability. The State may refile, but they’ll be doing so under the weight of constitutional scrutiny, tainted evidence, and a civil rights claim that’s gaining momentum.