Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TO THE FUCKTARDS KNOWN AS STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THE COURT HOUSE
#1
Quote:ASA/LD; DEFENDANT WITH PD SENGER; OVER OBJECTION OF DEFENDANT, PD SENGER ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW DUE TO IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES WITH DEFENDANT; STATE DOES NOT OBJECT; HOWEVER, STATE OBJECTS TO APPT OF "NEW APPOINTED COUNSEL" SINCE DEFENDANT HAS $12,500 IN BOND PENDING (COURT APPROVES A BOND ASSIGNMENT OF AT LEAST 1/2); DEFENDANT ORDERED TO ATTEMPT TO FIND NEW, PRIVATELY RETAINED COUNSEL; FAWC/COUNSEL STATUS SET FOR JULY 24, 2025 AT 8:30 A.M.


$6,250 isn’t realistic for retaining competent private counsel in a complex criminal case involving constitutional violations, forensic evidence, and federal-state entanglement. Most defense attorneys—especially those with the skill to handle a case like mine—require retainers well above that, often in the $10,000–$25,000 range just to begin.

I'm not refusing to hire a lawyer—I'm being priced out of justice. That’s a constitutional problem, not a personal one.

THIS IS A VIOLATION OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Reply
#2
6th amendment violation see also Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Reply
#3
If anything, I will file a habeas corpus with the FEDERAL courts of I can find council and or I am not given council under the 6th amendment
Reply
#4
[Image: OIP.myfPL0-cc-UHF95vA3K2dwAAAA?w=320&h=2...n&o=7&rm=3]

Oh, and you should sue the public defender over this and appeal the judge's decision.

Your Daddy will cough up the money.
Reply
#5
Your Honor, I’m being asked to finance my own defense against a prosecution rooted in unlawful conduct by the State and federal government. I have no liquid assets, and the bond money available is insufficient to retain competent counsel. Forcing me to go into debt or proceed without representation is not justice—it’s a denial of my constitutional rights.
Reply
#6
I suggest you get your fat, stubby body off the couch and go out and try to hire an attorney. AI isn't the answer.

The clock is ticking

And McDonalds is always hiring
Reply
#7
The court’s requirement that I use half of my bond to retain counsel—when that amount is insufficient—violates my rights under the Sixth Amendment (right to counsel), Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection and due process), and Eighth Amendment (excessive bail). I am being forced to choose between liberty and representation, which is a false and unconstitutional dilemma.
Reply
#8
If you perhaps kept your mouth shut, you wouldn't be in the position are you now. What rational person accuses their own public defender of sucking dicks of police officers? Maybe some anger management classes and proper medication might help you with the anger issues. Don't know about your sexual urges toward children though, that might be fixable.

I don't think typing endless responses on here while you do nothing in real life is going to help you. But please, for our entertainment, keep it up.
Reply
#9
it called free speech asshole; it's something we have here in the United States.

I would like to see a link to that alleged comment because I don't think I made it.
Reply
#10
Oh well, you had your chance to argue that in court.

Snooze you lose.....
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)