Have you considered getting professional help and therapy to overcome your sexual addiction to children in real, anime and virtual forms?

When did you realize you were sexually attracted to children? When did your parents find out?

LOOK AT ME MOMMY Wrote:My book Dimensions Unbound is on Amazon.com and this coming week, you will be able to buy it at B&N (Barnes and Noble)

My book Dimensions Unbound is on Amazon.com and this coming week, you will be able to buy it at B&N (Barnes and Noble)

1. What is a Franks Hearing?


A Franks hearing is a court proceeding that challenges the validity of a search warrant. The hearing is named after the case Franks v. Delaware, which established the legal standard for challenging search warrants. 


2. How does a Franks hearing work?

1. The defendant requests a Franks hearing by filing a Franks motion with the judge. 
   
   
2. The judge grants a hearing if the defendant makes a preliminary showing that the affidavit contains false statements. 
   
   
3. At the hearing, the defendant presents evidence to prove that the affidavit contains false statements or omissions. 
   
   
4. If the defendant is successful, the judge suppresses any evidence obtained from the search. 
   

KEEP POSTING PICTURES OF NUDITY OR PORN AND YOU WILL BE BANNED.


I AM NOT PLAYING GAMES.

"On March 21, 2018, officer Christian Nelson obtained a warrant for Daugherty's home (hereinafter the "Device Warrant") to seize "any and all computers... including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVD's USB devices... and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or media capable of being read by a computer..." Search Warrant, 18-MR-40 (Exhibit F). The Device Warrant further provided "authority to analyze and search any magnetic or optical media seized for the relevant evidence as outlined in this search warrant..." The Device Warrant did not mention what electronic evidence or data the police could seize pursuant to this warrant, nor did it name the crime for which the police had probable cause. Instead, it allowed an unlimited search of all of the devices. Furthermore, it did not expressly incorporate the affidavit into the warrant terms." (Daugherty's Motion to Suppress 2024)

He consented on your behalf, there was nothing you could do about it, and thus the search was legal.

You never filed any paperwork to get your computers back nor did you ask for them back legally. You were even shown the documentation to file and you never did.

TODD DAUGHERTY LIBRARY Wrote:Toad's big day version 23..... 90% chance of another delay probably by his own lawyer this time.

MANLET Wrote:NOPE, we already filed our stuff back in September of last year.

The state doesn't believe "any warrants previous issued are hereby quashed" is what we believe it is so here some stuff I found!


"Any warrant previously issued is hereby quashed" means that all warrants that were issued before this statement are now considered invalid and removed from the system, effectively applying to every warrant that existed prior to that point in time; essentially, it cancels all outstanding warrants. 


"Any warrant previously issued is hereby quashed" means that any warrant that was previously issued is now considered null and void, and this applies to search warrants as well; essentially, it cancels any existing search warrants that may have been issued in a particular case. 


Black Law Dictionary:

ANY. Some; one out of many; an indefinite number. State v. Pierson, 204 Iowa 837, 216 N. W. 43, 44. One indiscriminately of whatever kind or quantity. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. Winton, C.C.A.Tenn., 131 F.2d 780, 782. One or some (indefinitely). Slegel v. Siegel, 135 N.J.Eq. 5, 37 A.2d 57, 58. "Any" does not necessarily mean only one person, but may have reference to more than one or to many. Doherty v. King, Tex.Civ. App., 183 S.W.2d 1004, 1007. As a synonym for "some". Kayser v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California, 234 Iowa 310, 12 N.W.2d 582, 587.

It is often synonymous with "either", State v. Antonio, 3 Brev. (S.C.) 562; Carr-Lowry Lumber Co. v. Martin, 144 Miss. 106, 109 So. 849, 850. And is given the full force of "every" or "all", Glen Alden Coal Co. v. City of Scranton, 282 Pa 45, 127 A. 307, 308; Southern Ry. Co. v. Gaston County, 200 N.C. 780, 158 S.E. 481. Its generality may be restricted by the context, Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Bates County v. Bates County, Mo.Sup., 216 S.W. 949, 953. Thus, the giving of a right to do some act "at any time" is commonly construed as meaning within a reasonable time. Paulson v. Weeks, 80 Or. 468, 157 P. 590, 592, Ann.Cas. 1918D, 741. And the words "any other" following the enumeration of particular classes are to be read as "other such like," and include only others of like kind or character. Southern Ry. Co. v. Columbia Compress Co., C.C.A.S.C., 280 F. 344, 348. 

PREVIOUSLY. An adverb of time, used in com paring an act or state named with another act or state, subsequent in order of time, for the purpose of asserting the priority of the first. Lebrecht v. Wilcoxon, 40 Iowa 94.

QUASH. To overthrow; to abate; to vacate; to annul; to make void. Spelman; 3 Bl.Comm. 303. Bosley v. Bruner, 2 Cushm. (Miss.) 462; Wilson v. Commonwealth, 157 Va. 776, 162 S.E. 1, 2.