Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 296
» Latest member: acharlespetrvoz883
» Forum threads: 392
» Forum posts: 1,925

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 5 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 5 Guest(s)

Latest Threads
Daugherty A Theoretical F...
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
Yesterday, 10:36 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 90
ISP AND FBI ARE IN CONTEM...
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-18-2026, 09:12 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 8
THE ACLU SUCKS!!!
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-18-2026, 09:11 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 12
Open webUI
Forum: AI Information
Last Post: admin
03-18-2026, 08:56 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 64
Some Math
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-17-2026, 02:48 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 11
The Yellow Queen
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-16-2026, 03:00 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 16
What is Silly Tavern?
Forum: AI Information
Last Post: admin
03-15-2026, 06:07 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 13
Been Busy
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-14-2026, 03:59 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 18
Legal Update
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-13-2026, 07:43 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 16
Server back up
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
03-10-2026, 11:01 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15

 
  NO LAWSUIT IS EVER GOING TO HAPPEN
Posted by: TIME TO PISS OFF TOAD - 09-08-2025, 05:11 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (3)

JUST GET THE FUCK OVER IT. YOU ARE GOING TO BE DEPENDENT ON YOUR PARENTS FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. 

THE CITY, STATE, AND FBI ARE STILL WAITING FOR THAT INTENT LETTER YOU WROTE NINE WEEKS AGO BUT CHICKENED OUT TO SEND 

AND THE JUDGE BLAMES YOU FOR ALL THE DELAYS AND BLAMED YOU FOR FUCKING UP YOUR PUBLIC DEFENDER. YOU WROTE 4 DIFFERENT LETTERS YOU WERE GOING TO READ TO THE JUDGE BUT YOU STARTED TO CRY INSTEAD AND READ NONE OF THEM.

JUST GET THE FUCK OVER IT, YOU'RE A LOSER
[Image: R.7a8ed8ce2b6a8a8239a7112aa5ce322f?rik=1...ImgRaw&r=0]

Print this item

  What is a Brady Violation
Posted by: admin - 09-06-2025, 03:30 PM - Forum: Main Board - No Replies

Print this item

  MORE QUESTIONS
Posted by: admin - 09-06-2025, 03:15 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (10)

Back in 2023 we asked for discovery, and I was given discovery. the issue is WHY was there stuff missing (and some is still missing) from discovery? There was the original motion to dismiss from 2018 that was missing, there was the material from the hate and flame service provider, there was the letter from AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) explaining why the US government declined to take the case. Along with of hundreds of more documents. what is the STATE OF ILLINOIS and the FEDERAL GOVENMENT trying to hide?? Don't they know that's a Brady violation?? I have yet to see all the evidence they have or supposed to have, (including the stuff that proves I'm innocent).

Print this item

  Here's a question..
Posted by: admin - 09-02-2025, 07:29 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (14)

Why did the assistant chief of police leave a note on one of the devices with a BIG circle saying "stays at TPD" anyone??


[Image: 1.jpg]

[Image: 2.jpg]

[Image: 3.jpg]

Print this item

  Who is N9OGL Todd Daugherty (a convicted crimnal for one thing)
Posted by: BOUNTY HUNTER - 08-31-2025, 01:04 AM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (3)

Daugherty's responses in red (mind you, profanity, death threats, and such)

Who is Todd E. Daugherty, N9OGL?


In 2009, Todd Daugherty solicited the murder of a Pennsylvania
amateur, just as he threatened a 10 year old boy, members of the FBI,
and the Special Counsel of the FCC. Todd is simply 'not all there.'
Todd lives with his parents at 800 W. Main Cross, Taylorville, IL,


NOTE: Still does live with his parents at age 57
presently, and he pushes carts for a living at the Taylorville, Wal-
Mart. 


NOTE: He was fired from Walmart as a cart pusher.

The federal prison in Pekin, IL is located about 94 miles, and
one more death threat from Daugherty's present location.

REAL BRIAN, YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE...BRING IT ON, BTW I SURE A FUCKING
COURT OF LAW, WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY YOUR PROVOKING IT, AFTER ALL YOU
SICK FUCKING PSYCHOPATH, I SURE THEY WILL WANT TO KNOW WHY YOU
CONTINUE TO HARASS ME



Todd Daugherty hosted the OMEGA ONE RADIO SHOW on 13.556 mHz. He
received two Warning Letters from the FCC about his show.


HEY STUPID OMEGA ONE WAS THE NAME OF THE RADIO STATION, NO WONDER
RILEY DIDN'T DO SHIT ABOUT IT!! BWAHAHAHAHA BTW, THE FCC ISN'T GOING
TO HELP YOU, YOUR ON YOUR FUCKING OWN, SO YOU BETTER KEEP THE FUCKING
LIGHTS ON AT NIGHT.



The FCC sent a list of questions about the power levels he used to
transmit his show. Daugherty claimed he was heard around the country,
which would be quite a feat, without sunspots, operating into a zero
gain antenna, using a legal transmitter, emitting only a few
milliwatts of power.

AGAIN SHIT FOR BRAIN, I KNOW A LITTLE SHIT STAIN LIKE YOU DOESN'T
REALLY KNOW ABOUT PROPAGATION, BUT THERE WAS SOME THERE, A LITTLE BUT
NOT A LOT. SECONDLY ASSHOLES A LOT OF PEOPLE HEAR SHIT ON THAT
FREQUENCY THAT THEY BELIEVED WAS ME...YOUR SMART BRIAN ON THE
HARASSMENT, BUT STUPID WHEN GETTING YOUR FACT CORRECT.



On the internet, Daugherty claimed he was running well above the legal
limit for a part 15 station. In fact, he claimed he had an illegal FM
station, an illegal CB station, and an illegal SW station. (All of the
power levels he claimed on the internet, were well in excess of
permissible levels).


BWHAHAHAHAHAHA AND WHAT REALLY FUNNY IS A FUCKING RETARD LIKE YOU,
RILEY AND ALL THE OTHER STUPID PEOPLE BELIEVED IT..SHOWS YOU HOW
FUCKING STUPID YOU FUCKING REALLY ARE.


Note: Todd Daugherty was placed in special (retarded) education in grade school.

After receipt of his first Warning Letter from the FCC, Daugherty
wrote:

"If you wish to proceed to go after me for a lower radio station under
Part 15, then go for it! I will challenge it in the courts. I want the
FCC to go to court and explain why they LIED all these years about the
waiver process. I want the FCC how they SCREWED me out of licenses. I
also want the FCC explain why they are going after a Part 15 station,
which isn’t even on the air, but are allowing amateurs to abuse and
harass other amateur radio operators and purposely and maliciously
interfere with stations on the air and explain why these individuals
still have a license. It is these same individuals who informed the
FCC about my Part 15 station and it is these same individuals who had
me kicked off of ever service provider in my area “banning” me from
the Internet. So here’s a suggestion either consider my waivers and
applications or dismiss this, because I will fight it!"

AND YOUR POINT ASSHOLE?? THE FEDERAL COURTS HAD RULED AT LEASE FIVE
TIME TO MY COUNT, THE FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS, THE POINT YOU FUCKING
RETARD, I APPLY LONG BEFORE I EVER DIDN'T ANY SO-CALLED PIRATING,
AFTER ALL THAT'S WHY I DID IT...JESUS PEOPLE LIKE DO NEED TO HAVE A
BULLET IN YOUR HEAD IF YOUR TOO FUCKING STUPID TO FUCKING UNDERSTAND.
\

Note: They considered your waivers and rejected them.

We have quite a few recordings in our collection, pertaining to N9OGL.
They truly exemplify Todd's 'interesting' view points about how to run
a radio station. This recording is typical of Daugherty's radio
operation. In this recording, Daugherty engages in an insane rant,
sputtering, screaming into his microphone like a deranged lunatic,
yelling "Fuck You" and "Fuck You up the Ass" while clearly interfering
with a frequency in use.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA BULL FUCKING SHIT, I HAVE LOCAL HAMS THAT KNOW FOR A
FACT THAT I WAS ON THE FREQUENCY FIRST, LET SEE YOU EXPLAIN WHY YOU
HOMOSEXUAL BOYFRIENDS WHO ALSO NEED A FUCK BULLET IN THEIR HEAD WAS
INTERFERING WITH NOT ONLY ME BUT OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE USING THE
FREQUENCY..
.THIS LITTLE BULLSHIT EXCUSE THAT YOU FUCK GAVE ON QRZ.COM
ISN'T GOING TO WORK...SORRY




Daugherty's anime collection is notorious for its content, consisting
mostly of graphic animated images of children (infants and children 4
to 5 years old) being, raped, dismembered, tortured, and sexually
penetrated by adult males and assorted large objects.
This group of
lolicon images (lolicon translates to "lolita complex") was so
disgusting, it was removed by Google, event though they are
notoriously lax about complaints regarding offensive images.

AGAIN ANOTHER REASON WHY A BULLET NEEDS TO BE PUT INTO YOUR FUCKING
STUPID LITTLE HEAD
BECAUSE YOU DON'T FUCKING LISTEN OR DON'T GIVE A
SHIT TOO LISTEN OR DON'T CARE WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, SO I'LL SAY IT ONE
MORE FUCKING TIME....THOSE IMAGES ARE LEGAL BOTH IN THE STATE OF
ILLINOIS AND THE UNITED STATES (SEE ALEXANDER V STATE OF ILLINOIS
(2003) http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/Su.../93952.htm
SEE ALSO ASHCROFT V FREE SPEECH COALITION (2002) AND AGAIN (2004) IF
IT WAS ILLEGAL YOU FUCKING RETARD ALL THE ANIME SITES ON THE WEB WOULD
BE SHUT DOWN...GUESS WHAT?? THEIR NOT!!! GET THAT THROUGH YOUR FUCK
STUPID HEAD!!


Daugherty's response to people who have made complaints, is to
threaten them with bodily harm. Daugherty even threatened a 10 year
old boy with physical violence.

WELL YOU KNOW WHAT ASSHOLE, IF THAT LITTLE SHIT HADN'T HAD ME KICKED
OFF OF ECHOLINK I WOULDN'T OF SAID SHIT, I SAID NOTHING TO HIM ON
ECHOLINK INSTEAD I WAS TALKING TO ANOTHER HAM OPERATOR IN FUCKING NEW
ZEALAND WHEN THE LITTLE FUCKING SHIT STAIN HAD ME KICKED OFF...AND YOU
KNOW WHAT I THINK YOU HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT.




AND THEIR NOT...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THAT'S WHAT FUCKING PISSES YOUR
FUCKING HARASSMENT ASS OFF, YOUR BUDDY RILEY DIDN'T HAVE SHIT, HE KNEW
IT AND I KNEW IT, THAT WHY NOTHING WILL HAPPEN...GET THE FUCK OVER
IT!!


HEY KEEP POST MY EMPLOYER PHONE NUMBER ASSHOLE YOU PROVE MY POINT THAT
YOUR HARASSING ME, WHICH ASSHOLE IS AGAINST FEDERAL LAW! I HOPE YOU
CAN SLEEP AT NIGHT BRIAN, I'M SURE THERE ARE SOME DESPERATE
INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD WANT THAT $5,000.... Smile


Note: The $5,000 bounty Daugherty placed on him which is listed on his FBI file as of 2025.  Good for Todd Brian didn't prosecute.


Reference: http://www.ve7kfm.com/n9ogl.html

Print this item

  $5,000 REWARD
Posted by: BOUNTY HUNTER - 08-30-2025, 05:21 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (3)

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RHFIgblgPzM

Print this item

  April 2018 Motion to Dismiss
Posted by: admin - 08-28-2025, 07:23 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (10)

Now Comes the People of the State of Illinois, by and through their attorney, Michael M. Havera, and asks this Court to grant his Motion To Dismiss this case without prejudice stating as follows:


The Defendant was arrested on March 17, 2018.


1. That during the course of this investigation law enforcement has discovered that the web site used to disseminate the threat did not require any login credentials and allows anyone to post a message and sign it as a false author.


2. That after the defendant's arrest there were more messages posted on the same web site claiming to be from Todd Daugherty which is impossible due to the fact that he was incarcerated.


3. That it is known that other fictitious posts have been recently made on the same site claiming to be authored by judges, the president, and other such individuals.


4. That search warrants have been obtained and executed in this case to analyze Todd Daugherty's internet activity and have shown nothing to implicate him in this case at this time.


5. That the local, state, and Federal Bureau of Investigations are continuing the investigation into the source of the threats in this matter.

WHEREFORE, the State moves this Honorable Court to dismiss this case without prejudice.

Respectfully Submitted,

Michael M. Havera, Christian County State's Attorney

ORDER

FILED

APR 16 2018

Julie J. Mayer Circuit Clerk Christian County

Upon Motion of the Christian County State's Attorney's Office, the charges identified above are hereby dismissed without prejudice to the People of the State of Illinois. Any warrants or summonses previously issued are hereby quashed.

ENTERED:

4/16/18

Print this item

  Another thing Officer (now Sgt) Nelson didn't mention in the search warrant
Posted by: TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS - 08-28-2025, 12:57 AM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (10)

That you were convicted in 2010 for threatening to blow up your local cable/telephone company with a pipe bomb with a full written confession.

Or that you were found guilty of Violation of Probation in 2012 and got physically violent and had to be restrained.

Funny how you don't complain about that not being mentioned in the search warrant.

Smile

Print this item

  You're fucked
Posted by: TODD LIKES DICK PIC PORNS - 08-27-2025, 07:38 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (19)

Just as what I have been saying, right down to good faith. Plus you can't afford as Franks Hearing and your lawyer and your lawyer alone determines it.

Search warrant was supported by probable cause

Where an affidavit supporting a search warrant included information that a woman contacted other parties through Facebook and text messages as part of a bribery scheme, that provided probable cause for a warrant allowing the search of her electronic devices.

Background

This matter is presently before the court on defendant Joshua Brady’s motion to suppress. Defendant’s challenge centers around a search warrant obtained and executed by the Chesterfield County Police Department, or CCPD. Defendant contends that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and the delay between the seizure of his electronic devices by CCPD, and the subsequent execution of a federal search warrant to search the contents of the devices, violated the Fourth Amendment.

Analysis

Defendant argues that the search violated the Fourth Amendment because the affidavit did not contain sufficient information that would indicate that incriminating evidence would be located at the residence. Specifically, defendant states that the evidence in the affidavit was only sufficient to justify a search of defendant personally and his phone. Thus, what seems to be at issue is where incriminating evidence of witness bribery could be found, and the relationship between the evidence sought (all electronic devices) and the place to be searched (the listed address).

The search warrant at issue involved a search of 19820 Oak River Drive, for “any and all electronic devices, including but not limited to: computers, cell phones, all electronic storage devices, and the data contained therein.” The affidavit included information that defendant contacted another involved party through Facebook and text messages. The affidavit also indicated that defendant sent JE, the falsely accused rape perpetrator, threatening messages through Snapchat. These applications are both accessed via electronic devices making it reasonable for a magistrate to make the inference that they could be accessed on defendant’s computer as well as his phone.

Additionally, the affidavit included information that defendant told ME he had paid her for the false report using wire transfers. A wire transfer could be completed on a computer or other electronic device other than defendant’s phone. In fact, Detective Hartsook testified at the suppression hearing that, in her experience dealing with electronic evidence, there was a probability that this evidence could be accessed by, backed up to or saved to a computer.

While Detective Hartsook did not have direct evidence that defendant accessed these applications on his computer, “probable cause can be inferred from the circumstances, and a warrant is not invalid for failure to produce direct evidence.” A magistrate could find a substantial basis to conclude, based on the affidavit which describes the false report and bribery in detail, that evidence of the crime of bribery would be found on defendant’s electronic devices.

Assuming, for the sake of argument, that the warrant was facially invalid, the good faith exception, as outlined in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (908), still bars suppression. Although defendant claims that “Detective Hartsook was reckless in omitting several material facts known to her, and which would have been material to the magistrate,” there is no evidence in the record that Detective Hartsook omitted these facts in an attempt to mislead the magistrate. Even if the evidence was included in the affidavit, moreover, it would not have defeated probable cause to search defendant’s residence. Indeed, some of the omitted facts may have strengthened probable cause.

Next, defendant argues that the delay between the state seizure of the devices and their subsequent search by federal agents constituted a violation of the Warrants Clause. The two cases he relies upon, however, both involved warrantless seizures followed by a delay in obtaining a warrant to search the seized items. In this case, by contrast, there was a valid search warrant at the time of the initial seizure. The state search warrant authorized not only seizure of all electronic devices, but also a search of their contents for evidence of the crime. Even if the cases relied upon by defendant extended to cases involving valid search warrants where there is a delay in the actual search, moreover, the delay here was justified.

Defendant’s motion to suppress denied.

Print this item

  STILL WAITING
Posted by: admin - 08-27-2025, 04:10 PM - Forum: Main Board - Replies (10)

STILL WAITING FOR MY FRANKS HEARING....then again, the longer the delay, the better it will work for me  Smile Big Grin

Print this item