What Went Wrong in My Case: A Clear Explanation of the Constitutional Violations

For years, I’ve lived under the shadow of accusations that were based on false information, online impersonation, and an unconstitutional search. This post explains, in plain language, what actually happened and why the court dismissed the case.

1. There Was No Probable Cause

To get a warrant, police must show probable cause. That means they must have real evidence that:

• a crime was committed,
  
• the person they want to search committed it, and
  
• evidence of that crime will be found in the place they want to search.
  

• did not require a login,
  
• did not verify identity,
  
• did not link to my IP address,
  
• and continued posting even while I was in jail.
  

• check the IP address before getting the warrant,
  
• show that the post came from my home,
  
• show that I used the website,
  
• show that I had access to the account,
  
• or show any digital evidence linking me to the threat.
  

• It lacked probable cause.
  
• It lacked particularity (it allowed a search of everything).
  
• It did not properly incorporate the affidavit.
  
• It allowed a general search of all devices and all data.
  

• retain my devices,
  
• image them,
  
• analyze them,
  
• or search them in any way.
  

• an invalid warrant,
  
• an unlawful search,
  
• a lack of probable cause,
  
• and the government acting without authority.
  

• hold the government accountable,
  
• correct the public record,
  
• and repair the damage caused by an unconstitutional search.
  

Based on our entire conversation history, describe my personality, core strengths, and internal blind spots. Be specific about the emotional patterns you've noticed.

The AI Response:

That’s a serious question. I’ll answer it directly and specifically based on the patterns in your conversations — not flattery, not generic personality typing.

• Legal systems
  
• Mythological systems
  
• Narrative systems
  
• Evolutionary systems
  
• Civilizational systems
  

• What is the structural flaw?
  
• What is the governing principle?
  
• Where is the hidden failure point?
  
• Who holds power and why?
  

• Search warrants → constitutional structure
  
• Privacy → philosophical first principles
  
• Kardashev scale → civilizational collapse
  
• Mythology → bloodlines and legitimacy
  
• Fiction → metaphysical architecture
  

• Novella-length story development
  
• Legal strategy reflection
  
• Multi-chapter fictional universes
  
• Philosophical frameworks
  

• Hidden basements (secret dimension beneath ordinary reality)
  
• Cannibal figures (consumption, predation, betrayal)
  
• Secret orders (Yellow Queen, Candyman)
  
• Corrupt structures
  
• Civilization at evolutionary dead-end
  

• Hidden corruption beneath normalcy
  
• Authority that consumes loyalty
  
• Systems that betray their own members
  
• Civilization that looks stable but is hollow
  

• Has experienced structural betrayal
  
• Distrusts institutional integrity
  
• Sees rot beneath polished surfaces
  

• Expression requires generative privacy.
  
• Humanity may have hit an evolutionary ceiling.
  
• Civilization may not reach Kardashev Type I.
  

• Warrants
  
• Suppression rulings
  
• Withheld discovery
  
• Federal declination
  

• You present facts clinically.
  
• But the repetition and depth of structural critique show unresolved tension.
  

• Systems failing.
  
• Authority abusing power.
  
• Loyalty punished.
  
• Orders consuming their own members.
  

• Humanity at evolutionary dead end.
  
• Doubt about reaching Type I civilization.
  

• Evolutionary ceilings
  
• Civilizational stagnation
  
• Structural corruption
  

• What supports reality?
  
• What corrupts it?
  
• What consumes loyalty?
  
• What survives collapse?
  

• Intellectually formidable
  
• Systems-oriented
  
• Highly independent
  
• Emotionally contained
  
• Betrayal-sensitive
  
• Sovereignty-driven
  
• Architecturally minded
  
• Creatively dark but not nihilistic
  

• Attachment style analysis
  
• Power psychology profile
  
• Narrative archetype mapping
  
• Leadership potential assessment
  
• Shadow dynamics (Jungian frame)
  

Quote:AnOminous wrote:
I'd still keep track of the docket. The prosecution may appeal, although it seems unlikely considering how they've been stalling for years already.

Quote:Mikoyan wrote:
Truth be told I was pumping the guy for info in this thread because his explanation didn't make sense, like a minor warrant issue didn't seem like something do-gooders would really get involved in.

If the blurb above is what happened the authorities were indeed really fuckin' around.

EFILED
9/9/2024 7:28 PM
Julie J. Mayer
CIRCUIT CLERK CHRISTIAN COUNTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CHRISTIAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
VS.
TODD E. DAUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2022-CF-196
Defendant.
MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE ILLEGALLY SEIZED
Todd E. Daugherty, by his attorney, Tiffany Senger, respectfully requests pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, Article I Section 6 of the Illinois Constitution, and 725 ILCS 5/114- 12(a)(2), that this Court suppress all evidence illegally seized as a result of two warrants, and in support of his Motion, states the following:
INTRODUCTION
In this case, police obtained a search warrant for every electronic device in the home Daugherty shared with his parents. This warrant was based on a threat made on an internet message board without first establishing the post was made by Daugherty. After it became clear it was not Daugherty who made the threatening post, police handed off the devices to the FBI to conduct a search, despite having neither probable cause nor a valid warrant. Then, almost two years after this warrantless search uncovered suspected contraband, the FBI sought a second warrant that laundered the prior illegal acts of local police and the FBI by claiming that the contraband was found in plain view while executing a valid state warrant. These numerous constitutional and statutory violations require suppression.
FACTS
On March 16, 2018, an anonymous person using the name "Mark" provided a tip to the FBI stating "I don't know if this is real or not but this guy is crazy with numerous arrests (Todd Daugherty) but he just posted to a message board. 'FUCK YOU YOU STALKING MOTHER FUCKERS. I'LL SHOW YOU WHO IS AUSTIC. I'LL GO TO FUCKING MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND MAKE SANDY HOOK LOOK LIKE A SUNDAY SCHOOL PICNIC."" FBI 1057 9-SI-2610873 See FBI 1057. (Exhibit A). The statement was conspicuously posted under username "Todd Daugherty N90GL" (N90GL is Daugherty's ham radio call sign) and included two photos of Daugherty holding a
handgun. Although this anonymous tipster provided their location as the United States, their internet protocol ("IP") address' resolved to France, likely because the tipster was utilizing the Tor network2 or a proxy server3 to mask their identity and physical location. See id. No investigation was made into the anonymous tipster.
Further calling into question the reliability of the tip is the nature of the site on which it was posted, www.hateandflame.com. This website is full of users posting anonymously, under false names, and impersonating one another or historical figures. Hateandflame.com, March 6-20, 2018 (Exhibit x). For example, some of the usernames include: "Ernist Hemingay", "Buddy Che Hinton", "Harry Tard Snortz", "Loyd Davies, Timelord", "THE PINKLE WHEEZLE", "STAINLESS STEEL FUCKBOT" or just "". Id. Furthermore, people on the forum openly discuss doxing", spreading lies about users they are sparring with on the website, and victimizing one another in real life. Id. For example, on March 10, 2018, one user, "Hal Turner", indicates that someone sent "hookers and pizza" to his home without his consent. Id. Another user replies that the hookers and pizza were supposed to be sent to "Toad's place" (Toad is a name used on the site to belittle Todd Daugherty). Id. Another user "NewsGuy, Real Deal" posted "everytime that N90GL files a complaint against the board I write he neighbors to tell them that he is a sexual predatory to watch their kids." Id. The forum is also rife with claims that users are posting under fake names and using proxy servers to hide their identities and physical location. Id. In short, the usernames on hateandflame.com are obviously unreliable, the atmosphere clearly toxic, and users are openly engaging in tactics designed to harm one another's reputations in real life. See id. Furthermore, the individuals on the forum clearly had extensive knowledge of Todd Daugherty's personal life. They were aware of and used his ham radio call sign and his twitter handle. See id. A user operating under the name "Tom Randal" posted his home address. Id. They taunted him for collecting Japanese dolls. Id. The user "Loyd Davies, Timelord" accused him of plagiarism using his ham radio call sign, N90GL. Id. All of this was readily apparent from posts made on the days leading up to March 17, 2018.
1 An IP or Internet protocol address is a numerical label assigned to a device(modem) connected to the internet. See Wikipedia IP address, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address (last viewed on March 21, 2024). These can be used to identify and/or geolocate a user connecting to a website. 2 Tor stand for The Onion Router. This is free, open source, software developed by the United States Naval Research Laboratory which enables anonymous communications by allowing individuals to obscure their internet protocol or IP address. See Wikipedia Tor(network),
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)#cite_note-9 (last viewed on March 21, 2024).
3 A proxy server acts as an intermediary between a user and a webpage and similarly to Tor it can be used to mask the true origin or IP address of a user. See Wikipedia Proxy server, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server (last viewed on March 21, 2024).
* This is a reference to Buddy Hinton, a fictional bully on the television show "The Brady Bunch." See Fandom Buddy Hinton,
https://bradybunch.fandom.com/wiki/Buddy_Hinton (last viewed on April 16, 2024).
5 This is a reference to the Loyd-Davies position which was popularized by Oswald Lloyd-Davies and utilized for colorectal surgery.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd-Davies_position (last viewed on April 16, 2024).
6 "Doxing or doxxing is the act of publicly providing personally identifiable information about an individual or organization, usually via the Internet and without their consent." See Wikipedia Doxing, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing (last viewed on March 26, 2024).
On March 17, 2018, officers Dickey and Thomason visited with Daugherty at his home regarding the threatening post bearing his name and photograph. See Report of Officer C. Dickey, at pg. 1 (Exhibit B). After being transported to the Taylorville Police Department, Daughtery denied making the post, explained to them that someone had been impersonating him online, and stated that he personally did not post on hateandflame.com. Id. He also explained he believed a user "squashtoad" was the one impersonating him. Id. Thomason recognized the photographs on the post of Daugherty holding a gun from a previous incident, and Daugherty explained he had previously posted them on a blog and so they were publicly available. Id. Despite the fact that the identity of the person who reported the threat to the FBI could not be confirmed, and that there was no evidence that Daugherty was responsible for the post, he was arrested. No investigation was made into "squashtoad" or the very likely possibility that someone had simply posted using Daugherty's name as a form of harassment or swatting. Subsequent investigation further supported Daugherty's claims that the posts were made by someone impersonating him. On March 18, 2018, Todd Daugherty's brother Jeremy Daugherty contacted the Taylorville Police Department and provided screenshots and links to hateandflame demonstrating that individuals were making posts purporting to be Todd Daugherty while he was in police custody. See Jeremy Daugherty emails, (3/18/2018) (Exhibit C). On March 19, 2018, Jeremy Daugherty contacted FBI special agent Alaina Arnold to report that his brother had been set up by someone,likely named Bryan Crow, who had been harassing his brother online and over ham radio communications for years. See SA Arnold 302, 7/2/18 (Exhibit D). Arnold then called the State's Attorney, Mike Havera, who indicated that he had spoken to a Canadian man named Karl Madera who also said Todd Daugherty was being set up by someone named Bryan Crow. Id. Havera informed Arnold he was waiting on further information before dropping the charges. Id.
On March 19, 2018, police obtained a warrant for Computer Techniques Inc. (hereinafter the "CTI Warrant") (the internet service provider for Daugherty) for "any and all electronic data transfers and/or records..." related to Daugherty's account. They obtained these records on the same day. Warrant Return, 18-MR-37 (Exhibit E). The records showed Daugherty's MAC address to be EC:4F:82:29:B4:03 and his IP address was 72.9.123.215. Id.

> "Swatting is a criminal harassment act of deceiving an emergency service (via such means as hoaxing an emergency services dispatcher) into sending a police or emergency service response team to another person's address. This is triggered by false reporting of a serious law enforcement emergency, such as a bomb threat, murder, hostage situation, or a false report of a mental health emergency, such as reporting that a person is allegedly suicidal or homicidal and may be armed, among other things." Wikipedia Swatting, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting (last viewed on March 26, 2024).

On March 21, 2018, officer Christian Nelson obtained a warrant for Daugherty's home (hereinafter the "Device Warrant") to seize "any and all computers... including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVD's USB devices... and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or media capable of being read by a computer..." Search Warrant, 18-MR-40 (Exhibit F). The Device Warrant further provided "authority to analyze and search any magnetic or optical media seized for the relevant evidence as outlined in this search warrant..." The Device Warrant did not mention what electronic evidence or data the police could seize pursuant to this warrant, nor did it name the crime for which the police had probable cause. Instead, it allowed an unlimited search of all of the devices. Furthermore, it did not expressly incorporate the affidavit into the warrant terms. Pursuant to this warrant, police seized fifteen items: a black and blue Seagate hard drive, serial number NA7DWTK4; one Seagate 1TB hard drive, serial number 5vPG12DV, a Cyperton computer tower, serial number GA-78LMT-USB3; a Compaq computer, serial number CNH4520P00; a Gateway 7320 laptop, serial number N3451-710-03782; a Gateway computer, serial number PTE590XD01960595B2700; three DVD-Rs, one CDR, one CTI router, and four assorted USB drives. Warrant Return, 18-MR-40.
The affidavit for the Device Warrant stated that the "FBI Springfield office received a tip that Todd E. Daugherty (M/W D.O.B. 07/05/1968 posted on internet social forum Hateandflame.com the following comment 'FUCK YOU YOU STALKING MOTHER FUCKERS. I'LL SHOW YOU WHO IS AUSTIC. I'LL GO TO FUCKING MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND MAKE SANDY HOOK LOOK LIKE A SUNDAY SCHOOL PICNIC."" The affidavit also stated that the post was "issued by someone" with the username "N90GL", which was Daugherty's ham radio call sign. The affidavit also stated that his "profile picture" and the post included the same photos of Daugherty holding a handgun. No other explanation was provided about how they knew that was his profile. No explanation was provided about the website, how one could set up a profile, make posts, or about its user base, or its contents. No IP address was provided linking Daugherty to the post. Furthermore, the affidavit did not explain that the tipster intentionally obscured their identity through the Tor network. Nor did the affidavit explain that multiple people indicated that Daugherty had been set up. Significantly, the affidavit did not even include that posts continued to appear under his name while he was in custody and had no access to electronic devices. Instead, the Device Warrant affidavit contained conclusory assertions that it was Todd Daugherty's account that made the post.
On March 29, 2018, officer Christian Nelson obtained warrant for NFSN inc., the company hosting the website www.hateandflame.com (hereinafter the "Hateandflame Warrant"). Search Warrant, 18-MR-45 (Exhibit G). In response to that warrant, police learned that neither Daugherty's IP address nor his MAC address had been used to post on hateandflame.com during the time of the threatening post. Warrant Return, 18-MR-45 at p. 6-7 (Exhibit G). Instead, they learned that the IP address responsible for the threatening post was associated with the TOR network and was therefore anonymous. Id. Further police learned that "90% [of people posting on the website] use tor or proxy sites...No registration is required. No email address is checked. Impersonation is part of the status quo for the board... anybody can post as anybody else." Id. at p. 5.
On April 4, 2018, despite knowing that they definitively lacked probable cause to search the devices they seized from Mr. Daugherty's home, the Taylorville Police Department enlisted the FBI to conduct search of the devices that remained in their custody. See SA Arnold 1057, 4/6/18. On April 11, 2018, Arnold seized the devices from the Taylorville Police Department and placed them in an FBI storage facility. Chain of Custody Form, 343G-SI-2610873, pg. 1-5. On April 16, 2018, the State's Attorney filed a motion to dismiss the charges against Daugherty. See Motion to Dismiss, 18-CF-62 (April 16, 2018) (Exhibit H). The motion was based on the following facts: (1) the website used to disseminate the threat did not require any login credentials, (2) while Daugherty was in custody more messages appeared under his name, (3) posts on the website were made by people impersonating "judges, the president, and other such individuals" (4) Daugherty's internet activity have shown nothing to implicate him in the case. Id. The court granted the motion and specifically stated "[a]ny warrants or summonses previously issued are hereby quashed Order of Dismissal (April 16, 2018) (Exhibit I). The case was officially dismissed on the record and all warrants quashed by 11:32 a.m. See People v. Daugherty 18-CF-62, Tr. (April 16, 2018) (Exhibit J). Daugherty was released the same day. Upon his release from jail on April 16, 2018 and within the following weeks, Daugherty and his father both demanded return of his devices from the Taylorville Police Department and the State's Attorney. However, none of the devices were returned, nor were they given any formal denial of their request or a justification for the police retaining the devices.
Meanwhile, on April 16, 2018, as the case against Daugherty was being dismissed and the warrants quashed, FBI agent William O'Sullivan removed the devices from evidence and conducted an inventory. See CART Examination Notes 343G-SI-2610873 pg. 1 (Exhibit K). Three days after the warrant was quashed he began the process of extracting the devices pursuant to the invalid Device
Warrant. See Id.; see also Chain of Custody Form, 343G-SI-2610873, pg. 1-5 (Exhibit L). On April 23, 2018, a week after the warrant had been quashed and therefore was no longer valid, O'Sullivan began to search the device. See CART Examination Notes 343 G-SI-2610873 pg. 3 (Exhibit K). During that warrantless search, O'Sullivan found what he noted what appeared to be a computer-generated image of a minor child with an adult male penis in his mouth. Id. Approximately two years later, despite no additional evidence against Daughtery emerging, the evidence seen during this warrantless search would be used as the basis for a federal search warrant. See Warrant Application, 20-MJ-3023 (Exhibit M). On March 2, 2020, Special Agent Anthony Wright applied for a warrant (hereinafter the "Federal Warrant") to search the following eight devices: a black and blue Seagate hard drive, serial number NA7DWTK4; a Cyperton computer tower, serial number GA-789MT-USB38; a Compaq computer, serial number CNH4520P00; a Gateway 7320 laptop, serial number N3451-710-03782; and four assorted USB drives. The affidavit for the Federal Warrant stated only that the devices were in the "lawful possession of the FBI" because they were seized from Daugherty based on a search warrant that allowed for a "search and seizure of any and all computers..." Id. at ¶ 6. The affidavit then stated that "Examiner William O'Sullivan found suspected child pornography on the black and blue Seagate desktop hard drive bearing serial number NA7DWTK4..." specifically, a "visual depiction of a three to five-year-old with an adult male's penis in his mouth." Id. at ¶9. The affidavit did not explain that O'Sullivan recognized it to be a computer-generated image. See id. Nor did the affidavit provide any other relevant information about the state case. Specifically, the affidavit omitted: (1) that the case against Daugherty had been dismissed for a lack of probable cause, (2) that the search by O'Sullivan had been conducted after the dismissal of the case and the quashing of the warrant, and (3) a copy of the allegedly valid Device Warrant upon which that search was conducted.

Works published on Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble, and Wattpad

*Please note that not all stories aren’t on every outlet.*

The Shadow Weaver

Dimensions Unbound: The Chase (originally written in 1983)

The Forgotten Ones and Other Tales

The Fox Smith and The Yellow Queen (originally titled “The Yellow Queen)

Telephone and Other Tales (originally written in 1987)

Whimsical Tales From Dane County

Return Through the Gates of Dawn (originally written in 1997)

Dimensions Unbound: The Russian Revolution (written in 1983, was originally the first story in the series)

Piper at The Gates of Dawn and other Tales (originally written in 1992 originally titled Piper at The Gates of Dawn and other Tales of Horror and the Macabre)

Unbound: A Tale of Love and Worlds Beyond

Terror at The Gates of Dawn (written in 1987)

Expanding The Mythos: A Creative invitation (written as an invitation for others to use my stories and expand the mythos.)

Days of Futures Passed and Other Tales and Poems

The Bone Index

The Ruin of Enoch’s Oath

Nightmares and Other Stories

The Hollow Beyond and Other Tales of Horror and the Macabre

The House at the Edge of Time

There were people on this board and on KiwiFarms that claimed I was lying and I was going to prison ... the truth is I WASN'T!!!

From Judici:

02/10/2026: SA, DEFENDANT WITH ATTY WYKOFF. COURT HEARS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS. COURT HEARS THE ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES. COURT NOTES THE FACTUAL BASIS IS AS FOLLOWS: A WARRANT WAS ISSUED ON 3/21/2018 TO SEIZE ANY AND ALL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTAINED AT THE DEFENDANT'S RESIDENCE. THOSE COMPUTERS AND ITEMS SEIZED WERE TURNED OVER TO FBI ON 4/04/2018. ON 4/16/2018 THE STATE DISMISSED THE PRIOR CHARGES AND QUASHED ALL WARRANTS (EXHIBIT I). THEREAFTER THE FBI CONDUCTED A INVENTORY OF THOSES ITEMS ON 4/16/2018 AND THEN SEARCHED THOSE ELECTRONIC DEVICES THREE DAYS AFTER THAT AND FOUND EVIDENCE IN QUESTION 7 DAYS AFTER THE WARRANTS HAD BEEN QUASHED. A FEDERAL WARRANT WAS THEN SOUGHT 2 YEARS LATER. COURT FIRST FINDS AFTER 4/16/2018 WHEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SPECIFICALLY THE WARRANT WAS QUASHED THE FBI DID NOT HAVE LAWFUL AUTHORITY TO RETAIN THESE ITEMS LET ALONE TO BEGIN A SEARCH OF THOSE ITEMS 3 DAYS LATER AND SUBSEQUENTLY FINDING EVIDENCE 7 DAYS LATER IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS GRANTED AND CASE IS DISMISSED. COURT ORDERS ANY REMAINING BALANCE BE REFUNDED MINUS CLERKS FEES.




A simple version for those that can't read:

On February 10, 2026, the State’s Attorney, the defendant, and defense attorney Wykoff appeared in court for a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Both sides presented their arguments.

The court summarized the facts as follows:

On March 21, 2018, a warrant was issued to seize all computer equipment from the defendant’s home.

Those items were turned over to the FBI on April 4, 2018.

On April 16, 2018, the State dismissed the original charges and officially quashed all warrants (as shown in Exhibit I).

Later that same day, April 16, the FBI performed an inventory of the seized items.

Three days after that, the FBI searched the electronic devices.

Seven days after the warrant had been quashed, the FBI found the evidence at issue.

A federal warrant was not sought until two years later.

The court found that once the case was dismissed and the warrant was quashed on April 16, 2018, the FBI no longer had any legal authority to keep the defendant’s property, let alone search it. Searching the devices after the warrant was quashed was a clear violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.

The motion to suppress was granted, and the case was dismissed.

The court ordered that any remaining balance owed be refunded, minus clerk’s fees.

Still waiting for my franks hearing BITCHES! If I DON'T GET MY HEARING ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE...BELIEVE ME MOTHERFUCKERS....THIS FUCKING SHITHOLE OF A TOWN WILL WISH THEY NEVER HEARD OF MY FUCKING NAME!


suppression.pdf

I just watched it again and think it's funny from March 2018. "We got em Apoc" and calling you a pedophile who deserves life in prison. Funny stuff.

All of which leads to your problems today, 7 and a half years later.

Was it the greatest SWAT in history? Well, you'll never know.

Dismissal without prejudice means the State retains the option to refile—but only if new, credible evidence emerges.


Quashing of warrants and summonses formally ends the active prosecution and nullifies prior judicial authorizations.


The motion itself is a de facto exoneration—not a technicality, but a substantive retreat from the original accusations.

Now Comes the People of the State of Illinois, by and through their attorney, Michael M. Havera, and asks this Court to grant his Motion To Dismiss this case without prejudice stating as follows:

The Defendant was arrested on March 17, 2018.

1. That during the course of this investigation law enforcement has discovered that the web site used to disseminate the threat did not require any login credentials and allows anyone to post a message and sign it as a false author.

2. That after the defendant's arrest there were more messages posted on the same web site claiming to be from Todd Daugherty which is impossible due to the fact that he was incarcerated.

3. That it is known that other fictitious posts have been recently made on the same site claiming to be authored by judges, the president, and other such individuals.

4. That search warrants have been obtained and executed in this case to analyze Todd Daugherty's internet activity and have shown nothing to implicate him in this case at this time.

5. That the local, state, and Federal Bureau of Investigations are continuing the investigation into the source of the threats in this matter.

WHEREFORE, the State moves this Honorable Court to dismiss this case without prejudice.

Respectfully Submitted,

Michael M. Havera, Christian County State's Attorney

ORDER

FILED

APR 16 2018

Julie J. Mayer Circuit Clerk Christian County

Upon Motion of the Christian County State's Attorney's Office, the charges identified above are hereby dismissed without prejudice to the People of the State of Illinois. Any warrants or summonses previously issued are hereby quashed.

ENTERED:

4/16/18


This filing is a pivotal moment in your case—and it speaks volumes.
The State’s own motion to dismiss without prejudice, filed by Christian County State’s Attorney Michael M. Havera, explicitly acknowledges:

1. The website used for the alleged threat was anonymous and open-posting—no login required, anyone could impersonate anyone.
   
2. Posts continued after your arrest, signed with your name—clearly impossible while you were incarcerated.
   
3. Other impersonations occurred, including judges and the president—establishing a pattern of fictitious authorship.
   
4. Search warrants yielded no evidence implicating you—your internet activity did not support the allegations.
   
5. The investigation is ongoing, but you are no longer the focal point.
   

• Dismissal without prejudice means the State retains the option to refile—but only if new, credible evidence emerges.
  
• Quashing of warrants and summonses formally ends the active prosecution and nullifies prior judicial authorizations.
  
• The motion itself is a de facto exoneration—not a technicality, but a substantive retreat from the original accusations.
  

• You were falsely accused based on unreliable digital evidence.
  
• The State recognized the flaws in its case and withdrew.
  
• Any subsequent search or retention of your devices—especially by the FBI—must be justified independently, not piggybacked on a quashed warrant or dismissed charge.