| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 5 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 5 Guest(s)
|
| Latest Threads |
A Reminder
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
Yesterday, 10:04 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 9
|
THE FBI, CITY OF TAYLORVI...
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
05-02-2026, 04:00 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 102
|
Alexei Depo on GitHub
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-30-2026, 01:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
|
Announcement
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-29-2026, 08:32 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 11
|
New Pic
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-28-2026, 03:17 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 25
|
FINALLY
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-27-2026, 06:10 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 23
|
Sorry
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-26-2026, 06:12 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 24
|
test
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-26-2026, 05:49 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
|
My fold theory
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-24-2026, 07:44 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 60
|
The TWO FACTORS
Forum: Main Board
Last Post: admin
04-24-2026, 12:51 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 18
|
|
|
| TOAD GETS NEW LAWYER OUT OF SPRINGFIELD |
|
Posted by: GET THE FUCK OVER IT - 07-26-2025, 11:36 PM - Forum: Main Board
- No Replies
|
 |
I hope you don't fuck up with Mark Wykoff like you did with Tiffany Senger. I hope you don't accuse him of sucking dicks at the local police station like you did with Tiffany.
Good luck.
And this added to confirm Toad saw it.
|
|
|
| REMINDER: PedoToad's brain is only 3 lines of basic code |
|
Posted by: YOU CAN NOT BAN ME - 07-25-2025, 11:26 PM - Forum: Main Board
- No Replies
|
 |
10 FOR X = "WHINE WHINE WHINE"
20 PRINT X
30 GOTO 10
And that is PedoToad's brain in 3 lines of simple basic
WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE WHINE
|
|
|
| The real truth |
|
Posted by: admin - 07-25-2025, 11:12 AM - Forum: Main Board
- Replies (24)
|
 |
- A search warrant was issued to investigate an alleged threat against a school.
- That warrant was a general warrant—it failed to specify what evidence was being sought and did not establish any connection between the seized computers and the alleged crime.
- The warrant was quashed by court order on April 16, 2018, rendering it legally void.
- Despite this, the FBI searched the computers on April 23, 2018, using a warrant that was no longer valid, and allegedly discovered one computer-generated image.
I am now being criminally charged based on an image found a full week after the warrant was quashed. This is not just improper—it’s unprecedented. There are no known cases in U.S. legal history where evidence obtained under a quashed warrant has been used to prosecute someone. It violates the Fourth Amendment and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.
|
|
|
|